The University of British Columbia
UBC - A Place of Mind
The University of British Columbia
Asia Pacific Memo
  • About APM
  • Contributors
  • Regions
    • East Asia
    • Southeast Asia
    • South Asia
    • Oceania
    • Global Asia
  • Themes
    • General Themes
    • Event Focused
    • Topic Focused
  • Seasons
    • Season 1
    • Season 2
    • Season 3
    • Season 4
    • Season 5
    • Season 6
    • Season 7
Home / Indonesia’s Draft Law Exacerbates Religious and Ethnic Tensions

Indonesia’s Draft Law Exacerbates Religious and Ethnic Tensions

By Asia Pacific Memo on March 20, 2012

Memo #141

By Melissa Crouch – m.crouch [at] unimelb.edu.au

Conflicts between religious and ethnic communities in Indonesia last year raised fears that communal violence might again erupt across the archipelago, as it did from 1999 to 2001. Disputes between Muslims and Christians led to the burning of several churches, the bombing of a church in Central Java, and the displacement of 7,000 people in Maluku.

Tensions between the Indonesian military and locals in West Papua continue to simmer and minority religious communities such as Ahmadiyah continue to be targeted by hardline Islamic groups. This has produced outbursts of violence not seen for a decade.

The conflicts cannot be solved by strengthening the powers of the police and the military when rule of law enforcement itself is weak. Yet, this is what the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights has proposed in its Draft Law on Addressing Social Conflict. Instead of addressing systemic failures and a problematic culture of law enforcement, the draft law signals a return to authoritarian policies, confers wide powers to the police and military, and permits military involvement in religious and ethnic disputes.

The draft law would allow national or regional governments to declare a 90-day “state of emergency” in the event of social conflict. Most troubling, it allows for both military and extra-judicial intervention. In the latter case, the draft law proposes a Social Conflict Resolution Commission with extensive powers. Although the commission would include representatives from the military, the police, religious leaders, and the parties involved in the conflict, it would exist “outside of the courts.” Its decisions would not be subject to review, and therefore, made without accountability.

The draft law is not compatible with Indonesia’s young democracy, in place since 1998. If passed, the potential for military involvement and extra-judicial intervention – combined with the failure to reform the police – will exacerbate religious and ethnic tensions rather than diminish them.

About the Author:

Melissa Crouch – Research Fellow, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne.

Remains of a church in Maluku, Indonesia.

Graveyard of those who died in inter-religious disputes in Maluku, Indonesia.

Links:

  • Indonesia: Trouble again in Ambon, International Crisis Group, October 2011.
  • Indonesia: Hope and Hard Reality in Papua, International Crisis Group, August 2011.
  • Crouch, Melissa. Indonesia, Militant Islam and Ahmadiyah: Origins and Implications, Melbourne Law School, 2009.
  • Indonesia, International Crisis Grup, March 2012.
  • Panitia Khusus RUU Penanganan Konflik Sosial, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, December 2011.

Related Memos:

  • The Privatization of Security in Indonesia (Memo #20, by Abidin Kusno)
  • Our other Memos on Indonesia

 

  • Previous
  • Next
Asia Pacific Memo
Institute of Asian Research
1855 West Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z2
Email iar.ubc@ubc.ca
Find us on
    
Back to top
The University of British Columbia
  • Emergency Procedures |
  • Terms of Use |
  • Copyright |
  • Accessibility